Hamad Butt (1962–1994) was an artist working in Britain in the 1980s and 1990s. Celebrated at the time of his death for his eerie installations combining science and the occult, Butt fell into relative obscurity until his work and archive were acquired by Tate in 2015. His work was included in Tate Britain's rehang in 2023 and is the subject of forthcoming exhibitions at IMMA and Whitechapel, and a book by Professor Dominic Johnson.


Rumour, anecdote and archival research reveal that Butt’s work was in fact rejected for acquisition by Tate during the 1990s. Why might this be? What led to its eventual acquisition? And what might this suggest to us about wider shifts and pressures in contemporary art?


8 artworks
  • Transmission is Butt's first installation, produced while he was still an art student at Goldsmiths College in London. The work comprises a circle of nine Perspex books, each emitting UV light from its spine and displaying a phallic, carnivorous plant or Triffid on its pages. The installation suggests a curiosity about various types of transmission and the anxieties they produce: from the transmission of knowledge (the circle of books is an intended echo of a Quranic reading circle), to the penetration of the body and transmission of disease (evoked by the books' mosquito-like forms and the Triffids). While making Transmission, Butt cared for his partner, who had developed AIDS. Butt himself died of an AIDS-related illness in 1994.

    Transmission 1990
    Hamad Butt (1962–1994)
    Glass, steel, ultraviolet lights & electrical cables
    Tate
    Transmission
    © Jamal Butt. Image credit: Tate

  • Familiars consists of three sculptures. Cradle comprises eighteen suspended glass globes, each holding a small amount of yellow chlorine gas. In Hypostasis, three prongs containing bromine are bowed slightly and held down by steel wire, as if ready to snap straight and shatter. Substance Sublimation Unit takes the form of a seemingly brittle ladder, each rung housing iodine. Butt studied biochemistry before art. He was particularly interested in the role of fear in scientific discourse and the scapegoating of queer and racialised people at the height of the AIDS crisis. By bringing toxic substances enticingly close, Familiars asks us to focus on the experience of danger from which scapegoating discourses emerge.

    Familiars 1992
    Hamad Butt (1962–1994)
    Vacuum-sealed glass, crystal iodine, liquid bromine, chlorine gas, water & steel
    Tate
    Familiars
    © Jamal Butt. Image credit: Tate

  • Part of the allure of Butt's installations is the danger they pose to gallery-goers. Viewers of Transmission are required to wear protective goggles, and Familiars contains substances that are toxic in certain forms and quantities.


    During an exhibition at Tate in 1995, a sculpture cracked, and the gallery was evacuated. The artist's friends and family, as well as art historians and critics, have speculated that Familiars was rejected for acquisition in the 1990s precisely because of this incident and the wider risk Familiars posed to viewers. In fact, Tate had already rejected the work by this time. Long before it acquired Familiars in 2014, it accepted works containing harmful substances produced by more established artists.


  • In this installation, small hammers of varying lengths tap mirrors at varying intervals and intensities, like woodpeckers. The space is filled with the sound of the hammers and their buzzing motors. We might think of machines as serving particular human needs, but these devices move to their own rhythms. In this way, the work invites us to ponder alternative relationships to machines and technology.


    In later iterations of the work, Horn added two funnels of liquid mercury, which vibrated in response to visitors' footsteps. These recalled the movements of those who had originally experienced the work. A toxic substance, the mercury was replaced with foil and water in Tate's version.

    Ballet of the Woodpeckers 1986
    Rebecca Horn (1944–2024)
    Glass, metal, tranformers, motors & egg
    Tate
    Ballet of the Woodpeckers
    © DACS 2024. Image credit: Tate

  • This work consists of two glass vitrines housing a bisected cow and calf submerged in formaldehyde – a flammable solution that is harmful if ingested. Hirst has said that his vitrine sculptures emerged 'from a fear of everything in life being so fragile' and from the desire 'to make a sculpture where the fragility was encased.'


    Hirst graduated from Goldsmiths a year earlier than Butt. Some, such as the art critic Jean Fisher, noted similarities between Hirst's vitrines and Transmission, which originally included a vitrine containing larvae, similar to Hirst's work A Thousand Years (1990). Butt's brother alleges that Hirst visited Butt's studio at Goldsmiths before realising this work. Previously, Hirst has declined to comment.

    Mother and Child (Divided) 1993 & 2007
    Damien Hirst (b.1965)
    Glass, stainless steel, perspex, acrylic paint, cow, calf & formaldehyde solution
    Tate
    Mother and Child (Divided)
    © Damien Hirst and Science Ltd. All rights reserved, DACS 2024. Image credit: Tate

  • Butt was born in Pakistan in 1962 and moved to England at a young age. In Britain, this made him doubly 'minoritised' – both South Asian and queer. While there are political undertones to Butt's installations, visual references to marginalised identities are oblique.


    This distinguishes Butt from other artists of the Global Majority in Britain who became highly successful in the 1990s, like Chris Ofili and Yinka Shonibare. At the time, some commentators argued that their acclaim was partly owed to the blend in their work of visual markers of black identity and their playfulness with regard to identity politics. Butt's work may have been deprioritised for acquisition precisely because it falls outside of these narrow aesthetic parameters.


  • This painting displays a black superhero invented by Ofili. The figure wears a brash bodysuit that exposes his chest and torso, and rests one hand confidently on his hip. This caricatured representation is matched by the flecks of glitter spread across the canvas and the balls of dried elephant dung encased in resin. Ofili has described this fictional figure as a wry response to portrayals of black masculinity in blaxploitation films and comic books, most notably the American superhero Luke Cage, upon whom Captain Shit is partly based. Ofili has said: 'My project is not a PC [politically correct] project … I'm trying to make things you can laugh at. It allows you to laugh about issues that are potentially serious.'

    Double Captain Shit and the Legend of the Black Stars 1997
    Chris Ofili (b.1968)
    Oil paint, acrylic paint, printed paper, glitter, map pins, polyester resin and elephant dung on canvas
    H 244 x W 183 cm
    Tate
    Double Captain Shit and the Legend of the Black Stars
    © Chris Ofili. Image credit: Tate

  • This installation replicates a painting by Jean-Honoré Fragonard (1732–1806) in which an affluent white woman revels on a woodland swing, watched by two men. In Shonibare's version, the woman has darker skin and wears a print closely associated with West Africa. The work highlights the ideals of whiteness at the centre of the original painting, reinserting references to blackness through which these ideals were constituted. The installation also suggests the syncretism of cultural and ethnic identities more broadly: the pattern was appropriated by the Dutch based on Indonesian batik techniques and fabricated in England primarily by South Asian workers before being exported to West Africa.

    The Swing (after Fragonard) 2001
    Yinka Shonibare (b.1962)
    Mannequin, cotton costume, two slippers, swing seat, two ropes, oak twig & artificial foliage
    H 330 x W 350 x D 220 cm
    Tate
    The Swing (after Fragonard)
    © Yinka Shonibare CBE. All rights reserved, DACS 2024. Image credit: Tate

  • Butt's installations were acquired by Tate from 2015 to 2019. Over the same period, there has been a rise in demand for art that speaks to the experiences and histories of queer and racially minoritised people. In recent years, Tate has at last acquired work by artists active since the 1980s which directly represents marginalised people or engages with radical politics. Often, these artists were initially supported by smaller initiatives, collectives and organisations, many located outside of London.


    These works can now be discovered and appreciated by wider audiences. Yet the story of Familiars and Transmission raises questions about the parameters for success for queer and racially minoritised artists now.


  • This print incorporates newspaper material showing road builders in India; women protesting Britain's execution of Irish prisoners during Ireland's War of Independence; and women subjected to the Pass Law in Apartheid South Africa, which restricted the movement of non-white people. The images foreground the global struggles of women against colonial and neo-colonial powers throughout the twentieth century. The process of making these images – which includes coating etching plates with chemicals and crushing them under a printing press – recalls both the violence depicted and women's steadfast resistance to it. The print is part of the 'Riot Series', produced during a period of accentuated social unrest in Britain in the 1980s.

    Militant Women 1982
    Chila Kumari Singh Burman (b.1957)
    Photo-etching & aquatint on paper
    H 40.6 x W 99.5 cm
    Tate
    Militant Women
    © Chila Kumari Singh Burman. All rights reserved, DACS 2024. Image credit: Tate

  • This photograph displays a bodybuilder's muscular back, the white fabric of a bra stretched taut against his skin. The bodybuilder represents an ideal male body, with the bra offering a playful and erotic subversion of this ideal. Of his adolescence, Ajamu has said that 'there were particular unsaid codes … of how black men were supposed to act and behave.' He has described his photographic work as constituting an archive of alternative images of black queer people and cultures and an attempt to disrupt 'limited modes of representations around particular bodies'.

    Bodybuilder in Bra 1990
    Ajamu X (b.1963)
    Gelatin silver print
    H 34 x W 45 cm
    Autograph
    Bodybuilder in Bra
    © the artist. Image credit: Autograph

  • Further reading

    Ajamu X and Anita Naoko Pilgrim, 'In Conversation: Photographer Ajamu and Cultural Critic Anita Naoko Pilgrim', Paragraph 26:1–2, March – July 2003, pp.108–117
    Rasheed Araeen, 'A New Beginning: Beyond Postcolonial Cultural Theory and Identity Politics', Third Text 14:50, Spring 2000, pp.3–20
    Virginia Button, The Turner Prize, London: Tate Publishing, 1997
    Andrew Cummings, 'Lost and Found? Hamad Butt at Tate', Tate Papers, 2024
    Jean Fisher, 'Vitrines from the Pathology Museum', Vampire in the Text: Narratives of Contemporary Art, London: iniva, 2003, pp.258–265
    Kobena Mercer, 'Ethnicity and Internationality: New British Art and Diaspora-Based Blackness', Third Text 13:49, Winter 1999–2000, pp.51–62
    Judith Nesbitt, Chris Ofili, London: Tate Publishing, 2010
    Niru Ratnam, 'Chris Ofili and the Limits of Hybridity', New Left Review, 235, May/June 1999, pp.153–159